- Home
- Member's Only
- Year End Favorites
- Past Research Highlights
- Launch Active Demo
- Become a Member
LanczGlobal Latest News
©LanczGlobal, LLC. 2010
All rights reserved.
Our investment research and analysis has been nationally recognized:








Over the past eight years, investors have experienced at
least three major bubbles, which are now culminating into
one of the most challenging credit crises in many decades.
Legendary investor Sir John Templeton warned us 15 years ago
that investors would live through an "information overload"
period in which volatility and extreme global swings would
be much more commonplace and regular investment cycles would
fade into a distant memory. The volatility of the past eight
years has once again proved the late great Sir John to have
been right on target. In true fashion to his proactive style,
many experts warned about the overvalued financial and real
estate sectors up to 1 1/2 years ago.
For those investors who underestimated the effects of subprime
loans last summer, there were many other warning signs that
should have not been ignored. On July 31, 2007, two Bear Stearns
funds that invested in mortgage securities filed for bankruptcy.
One week later, French bank BNP Paribas froze three funds
with U.S. mortgage exposure as a presage to what was to come
for investors worldwide. Even if you did not understand the
ripple effects of how subprime loans would create a delirious
influence on the entire U.S. financial system, there was plenty
of time with these subsequent events to be proactive and lessen
one's exposure in these high risk/low return areas.
It was the massive leverage and layered complexity of these complicated securities, such as the credit default swaps, collateralized mortgage obligations and counter party derivatives that so intertwined our financial firms and markets. The fees and commissions on these financial instruments were enormous and the more the transparency dissipated, the more popular (easier to sell) they became. The instruments may change, but it seems the world of finance can never escape the strong influence of both fear and greed. In fact, with the credit crisis well over a year old, we are still seeing investors taking far too much risk in emerging markets and other investments that many times are not suitable for their situation.
For the past decade investors have just jumped from one investment category to another, chasing performance without taking into consideration any measure of risk. For ten years now, passive investors are showing a lost decade of no gains whatsoever in the S&P 500. Investors who chased performance have suffered startling negative returns, but investors who have utilized these extremes to their advantage by strategically taking profits, avoiding the tech/internet craze in 2000, the housing and real estate bubble and the more recent emerging markets and commodity bubbles have done well with a far lesser degree of risk. Which brings us to what may turn out to be one of the most expensive sources of the problem, and that is the lack of direction by many advisors. Here are some of the biggest mistakes and most costly errors we have seen with the recent market turmoil as well as over the past three decades:
The U.S. financial picture is filled with such a multitude of asset gatherers that sound like they know what they are doing, but who are putting many Americans in precarious financial situations. Perhaps they even believe that rebalancing twice a year or diversification into many asset classes will be enough to protect investors. These are times to be more concerned with the return of your investment dollar rather than the return on your dollar. Since many advisors sound so authoritative and knowledgeable to the average investor, we feel the old questions of "how are you compensated", "are you registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission", and "what are you doing to protect investor's assets" are not enough and specific follow-up questions are needed to verify that the advisor's actions match the talk:
These questions are just a start to see if your advisor shows an actual record of being proactive, or is just talking a good game. During times like these we would rather steer towards advisors who have protected capital in the past, rather than ones learning on the job. The upcoming $700B rescue plan in the U.S. is the first step in correcting all the excesses of the past 7-8 years. It is a move that is much more dramatic than what it would have been if the heads of our financial companies would have acted right away instead of ignoring the problem. This will protract any recovery and make the entire process much more costly - both in terms of future taxes and inflation - for many years to come. After being negative on financials since early summer 2007, we are finally seeing a light at the end of the tunnel with the passage of a major bail-out plan. Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG and Wachovia were all band-aids that failed to address the systemic problem. Now a course for the cure is finally being coordinated, but after such delays and mismanagement, the journey will be much more difficult and challenging for everyone.
Disclosure: LanczGlobal LLC is an independent investment
research firm. All articles and content are for informational purposes only
and are not intended to be a solicitation, offering or recommendation of
any security. LanczGlobal LLC does not represent that the securities, products,
or services discussed in this publication or within LanczGlobal.com are
suitable or appropriate for all investors. All recommendations and analysis
constitute an opinion which may change without notice and may or may not
prove correct. Readers must make their own independent investment decisions,
as past success can not guarantee future results. LanczGlobal LLC or Alan
B. Lancz are not affiliated or endorsed by any national media and only acts
as an authoritative source of information. Such information does not constitute
a recommendation to buy or sell securities or investment vehicles.